Whitney Ross Manzo
Connect with Whitney
About Whitney
Manzo's research focuses on representation and power, broadly conceived. Within these areas, she examines barriers to women's electoral success, the impacts of women in office, the impacts of different electoral laws, and public opinion. She also researches higher education pedagogy, particularly ways to make the classroom more inclusive.
Manzo is a contributor to the Old North State Politics blog, run by Michael Bitzer of Catawba College, where she comments on public opinion, voting, and campaigns and elections in North Carolina. She also regularly gives talks to local civic organizations on current issues.
Contributions
Making North Carolina Elections More Transparent And Accessible
In the News
Publications
Discusses how I changed our advanced research methods class to incorporate more hands-on statistics practice in Excel. This change led to better evaluations of the class from students, as well as more rigorous senior capstone projects.
Explores the disconnect between what students and professors view as learning objectives, and suggests that more transparency in the course design and assessment process would help lessen the disconnect.
Discusses the Voting Rights Act after Shelby County v. Holder: A Potential Fix to Revive Section 5" explores how Shelby County v. Holder changed implementation of the VRA in the United States, as well as offers suggestions for using Section 5 to achieve the original goals of this historic legislation.
Examines how different generations view women in political office. Finds that all generations report that they believe women and men are both effective political leaders, but there are differences between the generations regarding barriers to women's electoral success. Explains how older Carolinians believe family is the biggest barrier, while younger North Carolinians believe discrimination is the larger barrier.
Examines how Cox v. Larios changed the way that state legislatures draw redistricting maps. Finds that population deviations between districts were smaller after this case was handed down, which shows that the states pay close attention to Supreme Court decisions regarding redistricting and gerrymandering.