
Mary Angelica Painter
Connect with Mary
About Mary
Painter’s research interest includes understanding and developing new and robust measures to study social vulnerabilities in the wake of natural hazards; while also incorporating the effects of the role of government; policy; and politics in disaster response. Her work at the Natural Hazards Center focuses on finding the root of social vulnerability and addressing these issues in the context of disaster risk in a 10-state Midwest region; which includes her home state of Missouri. Specializing in research methodology; she is keen on developing statistical tools to advance the understanding of social vulnerability and disaster response. Painter also researches social vulnerability; compounding hazards/disasters; and political dynamics of disaster response in Puerto Rico in coordination with Social Vulnerability and Resilience Lab (SOLVER) and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR); which includes the role of policy feedback; social capital; and electoral consequences.
Contributions
How Inequality and Politics Influence Government Responses to Natural Disasters
In the News
Publications
FInds that communities with ties to the ruling party elicit greater government responsiveness while socially vulnerable communities are less likely to be prioritized during the disaster relief efforts, controlling for disaster damage as well as logistical, economic, and essential service recovery priorities.
Demonstrates that source cues (such as prominent politicians or interest groups) can move public support for some policies, however, most of the research on source cues in the United States tests the impact of national leaders or parties as cues. Argues that hypotheses about source cues should be tested in other settings, such as local politics.
Demand for luxury items seems to come from the rise in purchasing power of the average citizen on a global scale due to a number of developmental factors, especially for women. Results in this analysis show increases in beer consumption alongside an increase in gender equality in 2011. For 2014, the opposite occurs. I conclude the reasoning for the dramatic change is due either to growing health concerns or demand to purchase locally.