Kevin H. Wozniak

Draws on colorblind racism theories and the history of law‐and‐order politics while exploring how views of race relations and the police were associated with voting behavior during the 2016 presidential election. Poses the question on the one hand, whether people were engaged with the civil rights issues raised by Black Lives Matter and, on the other hand whether Trump's expressions of support for the police functioned as a racial "dog whistle" to mobilize a particular set of voters.

Uses racial priming theory to analyze black and white public opinion about the Justice Reinvestment Initiative with a particular emphasis on the choice of how to reinvest tax money. Tests whether exposure to racialized cue words affects people's willingness to invest money into the social infrastructure of neighborhoods of concentrated disadvantage versus invest money into the criminal justice system. Indicates no investment preference differences between people exposed to implicitly racialized cues and people exposed to no cues. 

Examines public support for sentencing reform for nonviolent offenders situated within a justice reinvestment context. Pays particular attention to difference in support between White and Black Americans, and analyzes the degree to which ideological beliefs explain interracial differences. Finds that a larger number of both Black and White people support, rather than oppose, sentencing property and drug offenders to community-based sanctions instead of prison, but the likelihood that a person will express support or opposition is related to several ideological beliefs and demographic characteristics.