Profile picture for user JessicaGottlieb

Jessica Gottlieb

Associate Professor, University of Houston
Areas of Expertise:

Connect with Jessica

About Jessica

Gottlieb's research focuses on understanding constraints to democratic accountability both at home and abroad. Themes in her work include state capacity, clientelism, civic education, gender inequality, polarization and misinformation. Gottlieb has conducted field experiments, behavioral games, and surveys across West Africa as well as in the United States. Gottlieb is Co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, a nonpartisan, collaborative effort to leverage evidence to better respond to democratic backsliding worldwide. She is also a board member of Evidence in Governance and Politics, a network promoting rigorous knowledge accumulation and evidence-based policy.

Contributions

Grant Terminated: Democracy Research

  • Jessica Gottlieb

In the News

Opinion: "How the Coronavirus Pandemic is Fueling Ethnic Hatred," Jessica Gottlieb (with Adrienne LeBas), Monkey Cage, The Washington Post, September 18, 2020.
Opinion: "Competitive Elections are Good for Democracy – Just Not Every Democracy," Jessica Gottlieb (with Katrina Kosec), The Conversation, January 3, 2019.
Opinion: "Why Mali is Making Headlines (and Why We Should Care)," Jessica Gottlieb, Good Authority, June 6, 2012.

Publications

"Depolarizing within the Comfort of Your Party: Experimental Evidence from Online Workshops" (with Robert A. Blair, Marie Schenk, and Christopher Woods). Political Communication (2025): 1–26.

Compares two online interventions aimed at reducing partisan animosity: one based on cross-partisan contact and another focused on within-group skill-building. Results show that the within-group intervention is more effective at reducing partisan hostility, suggesting that Americans can become less polarized without needing direct contact with opposing party members.

"Couples Therapy for a Divided America: Assessing the Effects of Reciprocal Group Reflection on Partisan Polarization" (with Hannah Baron, Robert A. Blair, Donghyun Danny Choi, Laura Gamboa, Amanda Lea Robinson, Steven C. Rosenzweig, and Megan M. Turnbull & Emily A. West). Political Behavior (2025).

Examines reciprocal group reflection, a method for reducing political polarization. Finds that those who participated in the workshops showed reduced polarization, greater empathy for opposing views, and increased support for depolarization efforts.

"Interventions to Counter Misinformation: Lessons From the Global North and Applications to the Global South" (with Robert A. Blair, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield). Current Opinion in Psychology 55 (2024).

Reviews a range of experimental studies on strategies to fight misinformation across both the Global North and South. Finds that the most consistently effective approaches are informational ones: inoculation/prebunking and debunking.

"How Economic Informality Constrains Demand for Programmatic Policy" American Journal of Political Science 68, no. 1 (2024): 271-288.

Argues that, particularly in weak-state democracies, economic informality constrains the rise of programmatic politics. Evidence from surveys and experiments in Senegal and two other African countries shows that informality inhibits the formation of a constituency for programmatic politics.

"How to Close the Gender Gap in Political Participation: Lessons from Matrilineal Societies in Africa" (with Amanda Lea Robinson). British Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1 (2019): 68 - 92.

Explores how the cultural practice of matrilineality–tracing kinship through the female line–helps close the gender gap in political participation across Africa. Demonstrates that matrilineality's success in improving outcomes for women lies in its ability to sustain more progressive norms about the role of women in society.

"The Countervailing Effects of Competition on Public Goods Provision: When Bargaining Inefficiencies Lead to Bad Outcomes" (with Katrina Kosec). American Political Science Review 113, no. 1 (2019): 88 - 107.

Examines how political competition affects public goods provision, particularly in young democracies. Finds that greater political competition is linked to worse public goods outcomes due to legislative bargaining inefficiencies.

"Explaining Variation in Broker Strategies: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Senegal" Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 11 (2017): 1556-1592.

Explores how political brokers influence voter behavior in clientelistic democracies, focusing on Senegal. Argues that brokers use distinct strategies—persuasion, reciprocation, and punishment—to motivate voters as a function of their local institutional context.

"Reducing or Reinforcing In-Group Preferences? An Experiment on Information and Ethnic Voting" (with Claire Adida, Eric Kramon, and Gwyneth McClendon). Quarterly Journal of Political Science 12, no. 4 (2017): 437-477.

Investigates how shared social identity influences political decision-making, using a field experiment during Benin’s 2015 legislative elections. Results are consistent with a theory of motivated reasoning whereby voters act on new information only when it allows them to reaffirm their social identity.

"Greater Expectations? A Field Experiment to Improve Accountability in Mali" Journal of Political Science 60, no. 1 (2016): 143-157.

Examines how raising citizens’ expectations of their government affects political accountability, arguing that when people underestimate what their government can and should do, they’re less likely to punish underperforming politicians.