Alicia W. Peters

Associate Professor of Anthropology, University of New England
Chapter Member: Maine SSN

Connect with Alicia

About Alicia

Peters' research focuses on how cultural frameworks inform the implementation of human trafficking law and policy. Peters examines how beliefs about sex, gender, and vulnerability inform the U.S. human trafficking response and the resulting effects on survivors. Peters' ethnographic work has enabled her to build connections with state task forces, community-based organizations, law enforcement personnel, and survivors of trafficking. Peters is currently immersed in an investigation of the human trafficking response in northern New England with the goal of contributing to future policy development and practice.


"Responding to Human Trafficking: Sex, Gender, and Culture in the Law" (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018).

Notes that while human trafficking is widely considered a serious and despicable crime, there has been far less consensus as to how to approach the problem—owing in part to a pervasive emphasis on forced prostitution that overshadows repugnant practices in other labor sectors affecting vulnerable populations. Examines the ways in which cultural perceptions of sexual exploitation and victimhood inform the drafting, interpretation, and implementation of U.S. antitrafficking law, as well as the law's effects on trafficking victims.

"Challenging the Sex/Labor Trafficking Dichotomy with Victim Experience" in Human Trafficking Reconsidered: Rethinking the Problem, Envisioning New Solutions, edited by Rhacel Salazer Parreñas and Kimberly Kay Hoang (International Debate Education Association, 2014), 30-40.

Explores the ways in which the experiences of trafficking survivors challenge the dominant trafficking narrative.

""Things that Involve Sex are Just Different": US Anti-Trafficking Law and Policy on the Books, in Their Minds, and in Action " Anthropological Quarterly 86, no. 1 (Winter 2013): 221-255.

Notes the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, passed by the US Congress in 2000, makes a symbolic distinction between “sex” and “non-sex” trafficking, (i.e., movement into forced prostitution and movement into other forced labor sectors), thereby marking “sex trafficking” as a special category. Explores how the law is translated into action through symbolically-mediated processes that incorporate assumptions and narratives about sex, gender, and victimization, as well as how the symbolic privileging of “sex trafficking” results in uneven treatment of victims.